< Go Back

What makes energy projects bankable in Africa – a practical guide

Africa’s energy transition is a major infrastructure opportunity. The constraint is rarely “lack of capital”.

The constraint is bankability: whether a project’s risks, revenues and governance are credible enough for long-term investors to commit and reach financial close.

This guide breaks down what typically drives investment decisions in African energy projects and what to strengthen to improve bankability.

What ‘bankability’ means in practice

A project is bankable when funders can see, evidence and price the key drivers of repayment and return. In most deals this comes down to:

• Clear, contractable revenues (who pays, how much, for how long, under what conditions)
• Credible sponsors and delivery capability (track record, balance sheet strength, EPC and O&M capability)
• Defined and allocated risks (each major risk has an owner and a mitigation instrument)
• Robust governance and transparency (decision-making, reporting, compliance, anti-corruption controls)
• Policy and regulatory confidence (stable rules, predictable procurement, enforceable contracts)

The core investor question – ‘Where does the money come from?’

Investors typically underwrite the project’s revenue pathway first, then test whether risks can disrupt it.

Revenue models investors commonly accept

• Long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) with enforceable payment terms
• Regulated tariffs that are cost-reflective and consistently applied
• Anchor offtake arrangements (for example, large C&I customers) with strong credit profiles
• Hybrid structures combining public and private offtake where payment security is credible

What weakens confidence quickly

• Unclear tariff-setting or political interference
• Contracts that are hard to enforce in practice
• Payment delays with no remedy
• Currency mismatch between revenues and debt service

Utility and SOE creditworthiness – why it matters so much

Utilities and state-owned entities often sit at the centre of the revenue chain. If their payment ability is uncertain, investors price that risk aggressively or exit the deal.

Typical credit concerns investors test

• Liquidity and arrears position
• Collection rates and technical or commercial losses
• Governance and procurement integrity
• Government support mechanisms and whether they are reliable

Practical ways projects protect against weak utility risk

• Escrow accounts and payment waterfalls
• Letters of credit and guarantees
• Step-in rights and clearly defined default remedies
• Political risk insurance where relevant
• Structuring offtake to include stronger counterparties where feasible

Early collaboration – how it reduces time-to-close

Projects struggle when investors are brought in after the structure is already locked. Earlier engagement tends to improve bankability because financing constraints are designed in from the start.

What to align early

• Bankable term sheet assumptions (tenor, DSCR, covenants)
• Realistic revenue and tariff model
• Permitting pathway and timelines
• Grid access and curtailment risk treatment
• Contract package: EPC, O&M, PPA, fuel supply (if applicable), land rights

Risk allocation – the bankability checklist investors run

Investors are not expecting “no risk”. They are expecting that risks are identified, assigned and mitigated.

Common risks and what good looks like

• Construction risk: fixed-price, date-certain EPC; performance guarantees; credible contractor
• Operational risk: proven technology; strong O&M; spares strategy; KPI-linked contracts
• Regulatory risk: stable licensing and tariff framework; enforceable change-in-law clauses
• FX and convertibility risk: hedging strategy; indexed tariffs; convertibility protections
• Political risk: insurance, guarantees, robust dispute resolution mechanisms
• Demand and offtake risk: creditworthy offtaker, payment security, clear dispatch rules

Innovative financing mechanisms – what they are used for

As projects get more complex or enter higher-risk markets, capital stacks increasingly blend instruments to improve risk-adjusted returns.

Common instruments and what they solve

• Blended finance: lowers overall cost of capital, improves affordability and tariffs
• Concessional funding: fills viability gaps or supports early-stage development
• Guarantees: backstop payment or specific risks to unlock private capital
• Political risk insurance: covers events that private lenders cannot price comfortably
• Development finance institutions often play a critical role by anchoring deals, de-risking specific exposures and improving investor confidence

Policy and regulatory certainty – the enabling conditions

Even strong projects become difficult to finance in unstable environments. Investors usually look for:

• Transparent procurement and tendering processes
• Stable, enforceable contracts and dispute resolution
• Cost-reflective tariffs or credible subsidy mechanisms
• Clear repatriation rules and predictable tax treatment
• Institutional capacity and consistency across political cycles
• When these are weak, the cost of capital rises and long-tenor money becomes scarce

Building a ‘bankable ecosystem’ (not just one bankable project)

Long-term capital flows more reliably when countries build repeatable conditions for deals to close, including:

• Stronger institutions and sector governance
• Utility reform and performance improvement
• Standardised contract frameworks
• Bankable procurement pipelines
• Trusted public-private collaboration models
• This is how markets move from one-off successes to consistent investment at scale.

Practical recommendations (actionable, not aspirational)

• Strengthen utility financial sustainability: improve collections, reduce losses, address arrears, professionalise governance.
• Bring financiers in early: co-develop the revenue model, risk allocation and contract package from concept stage.
  Use targeted risk mitigation instruments: guarantees, payment security, insurance and concessional components where they unlock private capital.
• Accelerate regulatory reforms: predictable procurement, transparent rules, enforceable contracts and tariff credibility.
• Structure credible partnerships: clear roles across government, utilities, developers and investors with aligned incentives and accountability.

WATCH THIS WEBINAR: Leading the future of AI-powered customer experiences

FAQs

Is capital actually available for African energy projects?

Yes, but it is selective. Capital prefers projects with credible governance, predictable revenues and well-managed risk.

What is the fastest way to improve bankability?

Make revenue security credible (offtaker strength, payment security, enforceable contracts) and fix the weakest risk allocation points early.

Why do projects fail to reach financial close?

Most often due to revenue uncertainty, weak counterparties, unclear risk mitigation, slow permitting and regulatory unpredictability.

Bankability checklist (government and utilities)

Use this as a pre-close readiness checklist to make projects financeable, repeatable and lower-cost.

1. Policy and regulatory certainty (sector-wide)

• Clear national power plan: least-cost plan, procurement pipeline and grid expansion plan published and updated
• Predictable procurement framework: standard timetable, evaluation criteria, dispute process and transparency measures
• Bankable standard contracts: PPA template, connection agreement, government support agreement (where applicable)
• Change-in-law and tariff adjustment mechanisms defined and enforceable
• FX and repatriation rules clear: convertibility, transferability and approvals pathway documented
• Permitting pathway mapped: licences, land rights, environmental approvals, timeframes and responsible authorities

2. Utility financial health and creditworthiness (utility-owned actions)

• Audited financial statements available for the last 3 years with credible management accounts for the current year
• Collections plan in place: billing accuracy, revenue protection, enforcement and customer segmentation
• Loss reduction programme: technical and commercial losses baselined with targets and funded interventions
• Arrears strategy: quantified arrears, repayment plan and governance for new arrears prevention
• Cost-reflective tariff trajectory agreed or a transparent subsidy mechanism in place
• Ring-fenced accounts for IPP payments (where used) with rules for prioritisation and oversight

3. Payment security and revenue assurance (what investors need to see)

• Payment mechanism documented: invoicing, payment timelines, default triggers and remedies
• Credit enhancement in place where required:
• letter of credit (LC) sized appropriately
• escrow account and payment waterfall
• sovereign or partial risk guarantee (PRG) where utility credit is weak
• Dispatch and curtailment rules clear, including compensation principles
• Metering and settlement systems credible: independent verification, data integrity and dispute handling
• Termination and compensation provisions defined and enforceable

4. Governance, transparency and anti-corruption controls

• Procurement transparency: published awards, conflict-of-interest declarations and auditability
• Clear decision rights: who approves what and within what time limits
• Contract management capability: named owners for PPA, grid connection, land and permits
• Compliance framework in place: anti-bribery controls, whistleblowing mechanism, supplier due diligence
• Stakeholder management plan: communities, municipalities, regulators and local industry participation

5. Grid readiness and connection delivery (often the hidden deal-killer)

• Grid capacity and connection point confirmed with a formal study and a committed timeline
• Responsibility split defined: who builds what (developer vs utility) and how it is funded
• Network reinforcement plan funded and scheduled with milestones
• Queue management rules transparent: connection prioritisation and timelines
• Operational protocols agreed: outages, maintenance coordination, communication standards

6. Project preparation standards (what government and utilities should enforce)

• Land tenure and access rights verified and bankable (no unresolved disputes)
• Environmental and social impact requirements standardised with realistic timelines
• Community engagement requirements clear, consistent and enforceable
• Technical standards specified: grid code compliance, performance testing and commissioning process
• Local content and industrial participation policy is clear, measurable and does not create unfinanceable uncertainty

7. Risk allocation and support instruments (use selectively, not universally)

• Political and regulatory risk mitigants identified for the specific market context
• Government support agreement used only where necessary and designed to be enforceable
• Insurance and guarantees approach agreed early (political risk insurance, PRGs, guarantees)
• Dispute resolution framework credible (forum, governing law, enforcement pathway)

8. Financing enablement (how to unlock private capital at scale)

• A pipeline approach: projects grouped and standardised to reduce transaction costs
• Clear stance on blended finance: when it is used, eligibility criteria and governance
• Development-stage funding enabled (project prep facility or similar) to avoid weak early-stage structuring
• Data room standards required from developers (minimum documentation pack)
• Timelines enforced: stop-start procurement kills investor confidence and raises pricing

‘Go / no-go’ quick test (use in internal steering meetings)

• Can the offtaker pay on time for 12–24 months without extraordinary intervention?
• If not, is there a credible, funded payment security structure that investors accept?
• Is grid connection realistically deliverable on the project timetable?
• Are contracts enforceable with clear remedies and termination compensation?
• Are permitting and approvals time-bound with accountable owners?

If any answer is “no”, expect higher pricing, shorter tenors or no financial close.

ALSO READ: How AI and data centres can boost South Africa’s capability for renewable projects