Angola’s Lobito Corridor has become the reference case for what serious corridor investment looks like in Southern and Central Africa.
Since the DRC cabinet’s July endorsement of the Mota-Engil rehabilitation partnership, the project has moved from planning to execution on its most strategically sensitive segment, the 450km DRC leg connecting Kolwezi, Tenke and Lubumbashi to the Angolan border.
The numbers explain why it commands attention.
Total committed funding exceeds US$4 billion against a US$5 billion project cost, anchored by the Africa Finance Corporation with a US$500 million contribution and governance role, alongside DFC and DBSA participation.
The corridor is targeting a tenfold increase in capacity to roughly 4.6 million tonnes a year, cutting transport costs for copper and cobalt by an estimated 30% and compressing transit time from the Copperbelt to port from 45 days by truck to under eight by rail.
Train frequency is scheduled to rise from 12 to 20 per week by 2027.
It is also, notably, contested infrastructure. China’s parallel US$1.4 billion upgrade of the TAZARA line to Dar es Salaam gives Copperbelt a competing eastern route, and the two corridors are effectively racing for the long-term freight loyalty of the same mines.
April’s flooding, which closed the line for roughly six weeks, was a reminder that single-corridor export systems carry structural risk regardless of how well they’re financed, a point worth holding onto as Zimbabwe builds its own rail dependencies.
Zimbabwe is running a comparable, if smaller and more fragmented, programme. NRZ’s 2026–2030 strategic plan centres on a US$3 billion rail investment pipeline under NDS2, including a US$1.2 billion upgrade of the Mutare–Harare–Chirundu line and the new 217km Lion’s Den–Kafue link into Zambia, part of a US$2 billion-plus bilateral agreement signed in April.
Separately, the government has proposed a Resource Financed Infrastructure model in which mining concessions form part of the state’s equity contribution to a rehabilitation joint venture, a direct echo of the anchor-tenant logic behind Lobito, where a commodities trader and infrastructure firm carry the commercial risk in exchange for long-term operating rights.
The clearest working example so far is the lithium export corridor linking Gwanda Lithium Mine to the Port of Maputo, concentrate moves by road to the West Nicholson siding, then by rail via Beitbridge–Chicualacuala into Mozambique’s CFM network and on to Maputo.
NRZ has flagged further mineral logistics hubs at Zvishavane, Dete, Shangani and Goromonzi, plus new links from Mutoko to Moatize and Kadoma to Sengwa. A separate corridor, Hwange–Bulawayo–Gweru, is being positioned around coal producers including Hwange Colliery and Makomo Resources.
ALSO READ: What a bankable Zimbabwean mining project looks like in 2026 – 7-point checklist
The contrast with Lobito isn’t really about ambition, Zimbabwe’s route map covers more corridors, not fewer. It’s about capital concentration and sequencing. Lobito’s US$4 billion-plus is committed to a single spine with one primary commodity thesis.
Zimbabwe’s pipeline is spread across roughly half a dozen corridors, Lion’s Den–Kafue, Machipanda–Harare, Beitbridge–Chicualacuala, Kadoma–Sengwa, Mutare–Mkwasine, funded through a mix of sovereign wealth backing, bilateral agreements, and a still-forming RFI model with mining houses.
NRZ’s own capacity has fallen from 18 million tonnes a year at its 1990s peak to around 2 million tonnes today, which is the more revealing number: the constraint isn’t the destination network, it’s the base the country is rebuilding from.
For Zimbabwean operators, the practical read is that rail is coming back as a genuine option for bulk mineral haulage, but unevenly and corridor by corridor.
The Gwanda–Maputo lithium route is proof of concept, NRZ notes that moving 1,000 tonnes of lithium by rail removes the equivalent of 33 haulage trucks from the road network, with direct implications for both logistics cost and road maintenance spend.
Whether that model scales to chrome, PGMs and gold concentrate depends on how quickly the anchor-tenant financing gets structured, and how much appetite mining houses have to co-fund infrastructure rather than wait for it.
This is precisely the territory the programme’s infrastructure session is built to address, corridor optimisation, rail rehabilitation, and what a bankable logistics pipeline actually requires.
Delegate registration is open, with early bird pricing running through mid-September, full rate card and group booking terms are on the programme page below.
📖Have a glance at ZMW26 programme: https://zimminingweek.com/programme/
🔗Register for ZMW2026: https://share-eu1.hsforms.com/19j3TubZlQTu6C2SiX8ueLAewv4c
READ NEXT: Zimbabwe’s critical minerals moment and what it will take to hold it
Contact Us
VUKA is the trusted media partner to key professionals, policy makers, suppliers and
manufacturers. We provide unparalleled opportunities for industry-wide connection.